Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial.

نویسندگان

  • Keith A Candiotti
  • Sergio D Bergese
  • Paula M Bokesch
  • Marc A Feldman
  • Wayne Wisemandle
  • Alex Y Bekker
چکیده

BACKGROUND Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is increasingly being used as a sedative for monitored anesthesia care (MAC) because of its analgesic properties, "cooperative sedation," and lack of respiratory depression. In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, Phase III Food and Drug Administration study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of two doses of DEX for sedation of patients undergoing a broad range of surgical or diagnostic procedures requiring MAC. METHODS Three hundred twenty-six patients were randomized 2:2:1 to DEX 0.5 microg/kg, DEX 1 microg/kg, or saline placebo initial loading dose, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.2-1.0 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) of DEX (or equivalent volume of saline) titrated to a targeted level of sedation (< or = 4 on the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale [OAA/S]). Study drug was started at least 15 min before placement of regional or local anesthetic block. Midazolam was given for OAA/S > 4 and fentanyl for pain. The primary end-point was the percentage of patients not requiring rescue midazolam. RESULTS Significantly fewer patients in the 0.5- and 1-microg/kg DEX groups required supplemental midazolam compared with placebo (59.7% [80/134], 45.7% [59/129] vs 96.8% [61/63], respectively; P < 0.001) and at lower doses to achieve an OAA/S < or = 4 before and during surgery compared with the saline group (1.4 and 0.9 mg vs 4.1 mg, respectively; P < 0.001, each group compared with placebo). Both DEX groups required significantly less fentanyl (84.8 and 83.6 microg vs 144.4 microg, respectively; P < 0.001, for both DEX groups versus placebo) for all surgical subtypes. Anesthesiologists indicated significantly increased ease of achieving and maintaining targeted sedation in both DEX groups compared with placebo with midazolam (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher with DEX (P < or = 0.009, both groups versus placebo). Common adverse events with DEX were protocol-defined bradycardia and hypotension that were predominately mild to moderate in severity. The incidence of clinically significant respiratory depression (defined as a respiratory rate of < 8 or an oxygen saturation of < 90%) was lower in DEX-treated patients (P = 0.018, for both groups versus placebo). CONCLUSIONS DEX is an effective baseline sedative for patients undergoing MAC for a broad range of surgical procedures providing better patient satisfaction, less opioid requirements, and less respiratory depression than placebo rescued with midazolam and fentanyl.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Effects of administration of dexmedetomidine with intrathecal bupivacaine on analgesia after femoral and tibia orthopedic surgery: A double-blind randomized clinical trial study

Introduction: Various drugs are used as adjuvants for various purposes such as increasing analgesia, reducing analgesic complications and generally improving the quality of anesthesia with topical anesthetics. The use of alpha-2 agonists has recently been considered. One of these drugs is dexmedetomidine, which has been studied recently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexme...

متن کامل

Comparison of the effect of adding dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to bupivacaine on nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgery with spinal anesthesia: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Introduction: Nausea and vomiting after surgery is a relatively common complication that despite advances in prevention and treatment is still the most problematic side effect observed in the recovery room and after surgery. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to bupivacaine on nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing orthopedic lower extremity surger...

متن کامل

A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Midazolam is the most commonly used premedication in children. It has been shown to be more effective than parental presence or placebo in reducing anxiety and improving compliance at induction of anesthesia. Clonidine, an alpha(2) agonist, has been suggested as an alternative. Dexmedetomidine is a more alpha(2) selective drug with more favorable pharmacokinetic properties than cloni...

متن کامل

Comparison Hemodynamic Effects of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as a Premedication in Patients Undergoing Upper Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Intervention

Introduction: Premedication is an integral part of general anesthesia which has side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam as a premedication in patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery during induction of anesthesia and postoperative shivering. Methods: 60 candidates for elective upper limb surgery who referred to Shahid R...

متن کامل

Acute postoperative pain in children.

References: 1. Wujtewicz M, Maciejewski D, Misiołek H et al.: Use of dexmedetomidine in the adult intensive care unit. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2013; 45: 235−2340. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2013.0045. 2. Chrysostomou C: Dexmedetomidine: should it be standard after pediatric cardiac surgery? Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012; 13: 696−697. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31825b84f4. 3. Whalen LD, DiGennaro IL, Irby GA...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Anesthesia and analgesia

دوره 110 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010